Research Facts & Figures > Economic Forecasts & Updates > July 2007 Quarterly Forecast > Housing Market Update

 

East Bay Economic Development Agency Quarterly Forcast
Serving the East Bay, The Bright Side of the San Francisco Bay

HOUSING MARKET UPDATE

 

For the Bay Area as a whole and the East Bay in particular, the 2007 housing market continues to show the pattern of flat prices and falling sales that we’ve seen throughout California – at least in broad terms.  The specifics of these trends in the East Bay have actually proved somewhat unique.  The second half of 2006 saw outright price declines in the East Bay that were among the most severe in California.  However, in 2007 both markets have not only erased these losses but have established all-time highs for median sales prices.  But before we crack open the champagne to celebrate the end of the real estate doldrums, a more in-depth look at these numbers is required.  This kind of volatility in median sales price suggests that in today’s low volume market, the month to month changes in the mix of homes sold is obscuring the longer-term trends of slightly rising prices in Alameda County and slightly falling prices in Contra Costa County. 

 

Figure 7: Total Sales (area) and Median Sales Price for All Homes, Alameda County, Not Seasonally Adjusted

Source: Dataquick, UCLA Anderson Forecast

 

Figure 8: Total Sales (area) and Median Sales Price(line) for All Homes, Contra Costa County, Not Seasonally Adjusted

Source: Dataquick, UCLA Anderson Forecast

 

While the overall data on home prices gives the indication that the housing market in Alameda County is holding up slightly better than in Contra Costa County, the newly released data on mortgage defaults shows a much starker divide between the two.  The following graphs present Notices of Default (the official beginning of the foreclosure process) and Trustee Deeds of Sale (actual loss of the home) recorded per 10,000 households for the East Bay, along with the data for Riverside and Santa Clara Counties to indicate the upper and lower bounds of what we’re currently seeing in California.  Like everywhere else in California, Alameda County has seen a surge in mortgage defaults -- slightly higher than the least affected counties, but still definitely in the lower half of the distribution.  In contrast, Contra Costa County has been hit hard by mortgage problems -- not quite as bad as Riverside County, but among the top ten counties in California in both Notices of Default and Trustee Deeds of Sale per 10,000 households.

 

Figure 9: Notices of Default Filed per 10,000 Households in Selected Counties

Source: Dataquick, UCLA Anderson Forecast

 

Figure 10: Trustee Deeds of Sale Filed per 10,000 Households in Selected Counties

Source: Dataquick, UCLA Anderson Forecast

 

There are also some indications that this financial distress is more widespread than just mortgages.  Year-to-date bankruptcy filings in the Oakland Division of the Northern District of California are nearly twice what we saw at this point in 2006 (2,029 vs. 1,083).  The rules governing bankruptcy filings were significantly toughened in 2005, which may have artificially lowered the filing rate in 2006.  However, this increase is still striking.  This highlights an important point: while the weak housing market and spiking mortgage defaults may only be a drag on the economy as a whole, it is a source of significant hardship for those caught in the trap of a resetting adjustable rate mortgage in a market where selling is difficult and refinancing is scarce.

 

section divider

 

Back