May 2003

 

East Bay Analysis

 

GDP SUMMARY

 
 

EMPLOYMENT

 
 

EAST BAY SECTOR EMPLOYMENT

 
 

HOUSING

 
 

CONSTRUCTION PERMITS

 
 

INFLATION

 
          
 Friend's Email
 
 Your Name
 
 Your Email
 

         

 
  

Cities of:

Alameda

Antioch

Albany

Berkeley

Brentwood

Dublin

Emeryville

Fremont

Hayward

Livermore

Newark

Oakland

Piedmont

Pleasanton

Richmond

San Leandro

San Ramon

Union City

and

Alameda County

 
 

 

Contact Information
Joshua Roth
Business Development Intern

 
 

EDAB
1221 Oak St.,
Ste. 555
Oakland. CA 94612
(510) 272-6843
joshuai@edab.org
www.edab.org

Building Resources, Businesses and      Quality Jobs.

Serving the East Bay, the Bright Side  of the  San Francisco Bay

For more information on the East Bay, click www.edab.org

For archived newsletters and forecasts click www.edab.org/newsletter

For more reports and studies on the East Bay, click www.edab.org/reports

 

 
  

EAST BAY MAY 2003 MONTHLY ANALYSIS

The East Bay Monthly Analysis is prepared by EDAB staff to augment the East Bay Quarterly Forecast that is authored by economists at the UCLA Anderson Forecast. EDAB encourages you to forward this information to anyone interested and welcomes your comments and suggestions.

For a more printable version of this newsletter, click here.

GDP SUMMARY

The advance estimate for 2003 first quarter National GDP growth is 1.6% compared to 1.4% growth in the fourth quarter of 2002. Major positive contributors to GDP included personal consumption expenditures, residential fixed investment, and government spending. A decline in imports also helped boost GDP, though exports declined as well. Holding GDP back were private inventory investment, equipment and software (down 4.4%), and exports.

EMPLOYMENT

The East Bay is maintaining a steady employment market, with few major ups or downs. However, according to the UCLA Anderson Forecast, the nation’s first quarter drop in spending on equipment and software is not a positive sign for future East Bay employment gains.

 

Payroll Employment

 

Mar-01

Apr-03

Change

East Bay

1,068,678

1,046,764

-2.1%

San Francisco

1,091,826

974,601

-10.7%

San Jose

1,050,127

880,093

-16.2%

 

Unemployment

 

Mar-01

Apr-03

Change

East Bay

3.0%

6.4%

3.4%

San Francisco

2.7%

5.8%

3.1%

San Jose

2.3%

8.4%

6.1%

In March, the EDD recalculated their employment estimates using a more accurate sample and discovered much more serious employment losses in San Francisco and San Jose than previously reported. Since hitting its peak in March 2001, payroll employment dropped 10.7% in San Francisco and 16.2% in San Jose, compared to previous estimates of 6.4% and 10.5%, respectively. The impact of these job losses fell upon many Alameda and Contra Costa County residents, as the East Bay is home to over one-third of the Bay Area’s workforce.

EAST BAY SECTOR EMPLOYMENT, Seasonally Adjusted

The unsettled nature of the current economy has resulted in some unexpected trends in the employment market. Manufacturing has lost over 20,000 jobs since the beginning of 2001 and Professional Services over 15,000, yet employment in the Leisure sector has risen by almost 4,500 jobs. The Financial Services sector has risen a similar amount due to widespread mortgage refinancing. Employment has risen in the Education & Health and Government sectors, though the State budgetary crisis is likely to result in employment losses in these sectors in the coming months and years.

For more industry specific employment data, please click here.

HOUSING

Despite recent price increases in Contra Costa County, the regional housing market has been growing more affordable since the summer. Still, the market is extremely tight in the Bay Area and across the state. The California Association of Realtors reports that the minimum household income needed to purchase a median-priced California home at the March average cost of $352,780 was $82,470, based on a typical 30-year, fixed-rate mortgage at 5.80 percent and assuming a 20 percent down payment. That same home sold for $305,840 in March 2002 and required an annual household income of $78,130.

The median number of days (Statewide) it took for a single-family home to sell in March 2003 was 28, and the unsold inventory index (an indication of how long it would take to deplete the stock of available homes if selling were to continue at the current rate) was 2.8 months. Thirty-year fixed mortgage rates averaged 5.75%, down from 7.07% in March 2002. Homes cost 5.7% more than in March 2002, with sales down 16.9% in the same period of time.

For more information on the housing market, click here.

CONSTRUCTION PERMITS

In March, Brentwood permitted $7.4 million in new stores, Oakland $4.0 million, Antioch $2.4 million, Hayward $2.0 million, and Livermore $1.0 million. Oakland also permitted $4.0 million worth of new office buildings, and in February the City of Alameda permitted $5.3 million worth of educational buildings (schools, libraries, or museums).

Continuing 2002’s trend, the permitting of new housing in the East Bay has primarily taken place in Contra Costa County, with a strong contribution by the City of Oakland in multi-family permitting.

For more information on construction, click here.

INFLATION

Inflation fell in April after jumping sharply in prior months. With the Middle East turmoil and fears of oil shortages, gasoline prices skyrocketed in the first months of 2003, contributing to the increase in energy costs that largely drove the CPI spike.

 

To no longer receive information from us enter your email address and click on the Unsubscribe button below.

Email Address